A Writer's Notebook, Day Six-Hundred-And-Fifty
One of the things that I often find when talking with other writers about craft is a sense of boundaries and walls that cannot be crossed. I will hear writers discuss craft as if what they see in the work they read and have been shown are the only way things can be.
In many ways, I feel the same thing is present for many people in this country right now. I know that their are some who openly cannot fathom the idea that anything is wrong, and that is delusional, but I also see that their are people who have only ever seen one way for things to be, one way they have ever been done.
When I talk to writers and suggest the possibility that what they have learned is only one way to do things, I used to expect that they might not see how to do it, but I was never saying that things could not be done as they always had, just that other possibilities might exist; why should that cause animus? But it often does, because people do not want to have their belief systems disrupted. If I am right, they may not know how to function. It is safer to stay in their limited perspective.
Now, in writing, that is probably fine, albeit limiting, but to discuss the issues facing the United States requires recognizing the danger inherent in systems built to perpetuate one perspective on society, and those cannot change without also addressing the assumptions about our world that all of us carry. It is a holistic problem, existing on many levels at once, and we cannot address it without doing so in that same holistic way, meaning that it must be exanined and addressed at both personal and societal levels. Neither one is a full solution
In many ways, I feel the same thing is present for many people in this country right now. I know that their are some who openly cannot fathom the idea that anything is wrong, and that is delusional, but I also see that their are people who have only ever seen one way for things to be, one way they have ever been done.
When I talk to writers and suggest the possibility that what they have learned is only one way to do things, I used to expect that they might not see how to do it, but I was never saying that things could not be done as they always had, just that other possibilities might exist; why should that cause animus? But it often does, because people do not want to have their belief systems disrupted. If I am right, they may not know how to function. It is safer to stay in their limited perspective.
Now, in writing, that is probably fine, albeit limiting, but to discuss the issues facing the United States requires recognizing the danger inherent in systems built to perpetuate one perspective on society, and those cannot change without also addressing the assumptions about our world that all of us carry. It is a holistic problem, existing on many levels at once, and we cannot address it without doing so in that same holistic way, meaning that it must be exanined and addressed at both personal and societal levels. Neither one is a full solution
Comments
Post a Comment